SIS 755FX Socket 939 Ref Board (4)

	<![if lt IE 4]> <SCRIPT SRC="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=js" LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <a href="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/go2/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435"> <img src="http://imgserv.adbutler.com/adserve.ibs/;ID=131075;size=468x60;setID=61435;type=img" border="0" height="60" width="468"></a> </NOSCRIPT><![endif]>
中文版 \| News \| Archives \| Reviews \| Forum \| $ Deals \| Links \| History \| Contact \| Privacy

SiS 755FX Socket 939 Ref Board with 2.2GHz CPU (4)
Bluetooth 25 May 2004

Benchmark

Test Environment
CPU Type Athlon 64FX 2.2GHz ( 755FX: 2199.74MHz K8T800pro: 2205.00MHz )
DRAM Kingston 256MB DDR400 SDRAM x2 with 128bit mode
Harddisk Maxtor 40G 7200 ATA133
Chipset SiS755FX K8T800pro
AGP Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB
Operating System Windows XP Professional
AGP Driver SiS755FX: R1.17a.00 K8T800pro: VIA Service Pack 4.51
IDE Driver SiS755FX: 2.04logo K8T800pro: VIA Service Pack 4.51
Ram timings : CAS 2, 6-3-3

From the benchmarks, it is apparent that the performance isn't a lot higher than what I would expect. This is probably due to the fact the R9700pro is almost at its limits. The 3DMark and Quake 3 results are better but not a great leap from the 3200+ Socket 754.

From the charts, we can see the comparison between the two chipsets. SiS wins some and lose some.

Next >>